Kate’s Future in Tech
Although it may appear a natural extension of her studies in Mathematics, software engineering wasn’t always a given for Kate, and the lack of inevitability has always left her questioning her future in the industry.
“Do I really see myself working in this way for the next twenty years? How can I get through the day, the month, the year in a way that’s interesting and challenging but also meaningful?” She says.
“I find my work interesting but—and I think this is a common experience—over time it can start to get a bit monotonous.”
On the other hand, she reflects, this propensity towards existentialism may be a sign that she is doing exactly the right job.
“Software engineering tends to attract more introverted types with a level of obsessiveness and a proclivity for abstract thinking, which might make them more prone to existential crises.”
Like the kind of programmer that “loves computers but also dreams of quitting tech, moving to a cabin in the woods and becoming a mushroom forager,” she laughs.
“I definitely have fantasies of moving to a commune in a remote area. I’m not sure it will ever happen but the nature of this career can inspire that thinking. There’s a duality in focusing specifically on the anti-humanness of a computer that can cause you to swing in the extreme other direction.”
Rather than heading into the woods, Kate is getting into the proverbial weeds of her career. She has undertaken professional experiments to understand what nourishes her as a person.
One was taking on additional management responsibilities to push herself out of her, admittedly fairly restricted, comfort zone. She discovered managerial duties weren’t right for her, but says that this knowledge has helped her refine her understanding of what she wants from the software engineering industry, which in turn gave her a sense of ownership over her career.
“It confirmed that, at least for now, the nitty-gritty individual contributor stuff is what works for my brain. That has helped me to move forward, even if I’m still not sure of the bigger picture.”
Kate’s concerns about the future are compounded by the way software engineering, and technology more broadly, is dominating headlines and increasing its role in society’s future.
Her response to this is to ally herself with Chegg’s value proposition to protect its market share in the face of disruptive technologies. Chegg risked being one of the first businesses to become completely outflanked by AI platforms which could render it obsolete.
Instead,the company leaned into the issue and adopted a strategy of acting as an intermediary between AI platforms and its users, through the development of CheggMate with OpenAI.
The CheggMate feature, yet to be released, is a virtual tutor that leverages the power of AI to pair students with the vetted content and help construct personalized study plans.
“ The world ten years from now is going to look very different, and lines of code will be directly what makes that happen ”
Software Engineering As A Human Pursuit
For Kate, it was important to bring her software skills to a company like Chegg, one with a vision of improving people’s lives.
“In an ideal world, software engineering is a way to make things easier for people, to allow them to do things they couldn’t do before. There shouldn’t be an inherent contradiction,” she says.
“Software engineering is a human pursuit and all human pursuits should have empathy as their guiding principle.”
The notion of empathy driving software engineering is important to Kate. She explains that for her, the original technology landscape was populated by people who made empathy central to technology, before the industry became commodified and profitable.
“There is a tradition of geeks and nerds, who are by virtue of their nature on the margins of society, having an appreciation for inclusion, diversity and existing outside the norm, seeking out those narratives through SciFi and adopting utopian ideals.”
Those people were also inherent to the rise of modern technology, bringing those ideas into the industry they built. But she points to the gradual fading out of Google’s ‘Don’t Be Evil’ tagline from the early 2000s as an indication of how big tech has moved away from those early ideals.
“That ‘good versus evil’ narrative is a strong thread throughout the history of computer science but was most dominant in the 1980s and 90s, when technology was dominated by passion, intellectual curiosity and a focus on ideals,” she says. “Capitalism means that the dominant forces aren’t incentivised to care about those things any more.”
However, Kate acknowledges that her concerns are shared by many others in the technology industry. While concerns about inequality in technology, from hiring practices to biased datasets, aren’t new, the recent explosion of AI has brought the topics out of Silicon Valley and into everyday vernacular.
“There are large subsets of the technology community having these conversations and trying to make a difference.”
She references Timnit Gebru, the ex-leader of Google’s ethical AI team, who was pushed out of the company after co-authoring a paper on the ways in which commonly-used AI-enabled platforms are exacerbating inequality.
“The world 10 years from now is going to look very different and lines of code will be directly what makes that happen,” she says.
Despite the potential pitfalls associated with this, Kate feels uplifted by conversations about how software can be a force for good when empathy is central to an engineer’s worldview.
“I find it inspiring talking about how software is foundational to society and the complex issues we’re grappling with right now. Even though I don’t feel empowered to fix all of those problems tomorrow, I do feel privileged that I am in a better position than many people to contribute to building a brighter world. I feel some degree of theoretical ownership over the future.”
One of the ways she does feel she can influence a future guided by empathic engineering is through her mentorship of beginner engineers. She explains that her concern is not so much about “moving up the ladder” as it is about holding it steady for others to climb.
“Being able to provide a mentorship role is something that appeals to me as a microcosm of how to resolve these tensions between personal and professional priorities,” she says.
She does this both at Chegg, and occasionally when joining in at Codesmith alumni events and women’s panels.
“Software engineering can be a mindset and approach as much as any particular technical knowledge. The main thing I try to encourage is a belief that the bootcamp path is a real, viable one that does work, as incredible as it might seem.”
Side Projects
With programming being a mentally demanding job day-to-day, it’s unsurprising Kate’s life outside of work steers clear of code.
“Once I'm done with work at the end of the day, I'm really not interested in spending any more brain power on coding,” she says, and describes herself as a musician first and a coder second.
“I played guitar in a band for a few years after college and I try to keep up with playing and recording music on my own in my apartment.”
As all strong engineers do, Kate is continuing her development through constant learning and is about to start college courses in music composition and audio engineering to “stimulate the musical and creative side” of her brain.
“Aside from the struggles of the single dating life, I've also started playing in a—very casual—women's basketball league, which has been a fun little world to get into, as well as kickboxing classes and random adventures like walking the entire length of Manhattan.”